Crude oil has had a rough week this week, down nearly 5% for the week as of Thursday night. Considering as of four months ago crude oil was in the midst of its worst bear market in history, a 5% dip after nearly doubling in value over the past four months puts things in perspective.
Crude bottomed near $26 per barrel on February 11 and last week it nearly reached $52 per barrel—that comes out to nearly a 100% gain in just under four months. That sounds like a large gain, but where does it rank in history? Using data going back to 1983, only two other times in history did crude oil gain more than the 89% it gained in two months (42 trading days) after the February 11 lows.
Only September 1990 and June 2009 saw crude gain more in a four-month period than the recent rally. Three months after the 1990 spike, crude dropped 25%; and six months later it was down 44%. The 2009 spike was down 1% three months later and down 3% six months later. Going out 24 months, however, the 1990 spike was still down 38%, while the 2009 spike was up an impressive 37%. In other words, after a good deal of consolidation, the 2009 spike was in the midst of a larger bull market, while the 1990 spike peaked with the rally.
So, which is it? Will crude peak here and now like it did back in 1990? Or will we look up in two years and realize there are still many more gains yet to come? Well, the one major similarity between now and 2009 is the rally took place after a huge bear market. We came into 2016 looking for potential stability and a rally in crude. That has happened, and as supply and demand continue to come in alignment, crude could continue to stabilize near the $50 per barrel area. Should crude hold around this area, the best opportunities could potentially come from oil-sensitive asset classes such as master limited partnerships (MLP) and emerging markets.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted.
The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide or be construed as providing specific investment advice or recommendations for any individual security.
Stock investing involves risk including loss of principal.
Commodity-linked investments may be more volatile and less liquid than the underlying instruments or measures, and their value may be affected by the performance of the overall commodities baskets as well as weather, geopolitical events, and regulatory developments.
Investing in MLPs involves additional risks as compared with the risks of investing in common stock, including risks related to cash flow, dilution, and voting rights. MLPs may trade less frequently than larger companies due to their smaller capitalizations, which may result in erratic price movement or difficulty in buying or selling. MLPs are subject to significant regulation and may be adversely affected by changes in the regulatory environment, including the risk that an MLP could lose its tax status as a partnership. Additional management fees and other expenses are associated with investing in MLP funds.
This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.
To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial LLC is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.
Not FDIC/NCUA Insured | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit
Securities and Advisory services offered through LPL Financial LLC, a Registered Investment Advisor
Tracking # 1-507932 (Exp. 06/17)